GRE写作开头结尾都是得分重点

GRE写作开头结尾都是得分重点 ,这些高分模板句式要学会。今天小编给大家带来GRE写作开头结尾都是得分重点 ,希望能够帮助到大家，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作开头结尾都是得分重点 这些高分模板句式要学会

GRE考试中新GRE写作模板开头

1. The arguer may be right about…, but he seems to neglect(fail) to mention (take into account) the fact that….

2. Although many people believe that… , I doubt (wonder) whether the argument bears much analysis (close examination).

3. It would be possible (natural/reasonable) to think (believe/take the view) that…, but it would be absurd (wrong) to claim (argue) that…

4. A close (careful) inspection (examination/scrutiny) of this argument would reveal how flimsy (groundless/fallacious) it is.

5. However just (logical/sound/valid) this argument maybe, it only skims the surface of the problem.

GRE考试中新GRE作文模板结尾

1. From what has been discussed above (Taking into account all these factors/ Judging from all evidence offered), we may draw (reach/come to /arrive at) the conclusion that…

2. It is high time that we place (lay/put) great (special/consideration) emphasis on the improvement (development/increase/promotion) of….

3. There is no easy (immediate/effective) solution (approach/answer/remedy) to the problem of…,but ….might be useful (helpful/beneficial).

4. Following these methods (suggestions) may not guarantee the success in (solution to)…, but the payoff will be worth the effort.

5. For these reasons, I strongly recommend that….

GRE写作高分的几点经验

第一，文章开始点明中心句

在每一段开始的第一行，最好能明确地表达你想说什么，也就是中心句。

这做法虽然死板，但往往有奇效。特别是对自己逻辑推理不是很有信心的各位，说清楚了，没说全面总比说都没说清楚要好。

第二，写作这个东西其实是相通的

我们中的很大一部分在高考结束后恐怕很少再写这么长的，同时主题又相对深刻的文字。英文只是一个表达方式，而论证过程则和中文没有任何区别。如果实在觉得难以上手，不妨先试试写一篇自己认为很深刻的中文文章看看。在逻辑和思想方面，这样的训练方式会有奇效，同时对于心理是一个不小的鼓舞。

第三，有关范文

范文是一定要看的，看什么。我建议，开始的时候，不要纠结于某某单词的某某用法，大不了你写的时候不用就是了。要大略的看，看作者是怎么展开题目，从哪几个方面入手，各自怎么论证的。

很重要的一点是，不要迷信范文。没有任何证据表明你看到的这篇范文出自一位逻辑学大师的手，即便确实如此，对于同一问题有不同的见解这是再正常不过的事情。思路可以借鉴，但千万不要僵化。

与此本质相同的另一个方法是，请别人改作文，就观点改或就文字改，按个人情况取舍。

第四，专门练习句子

如果真的想兼顾文字，不如在练逻辑练累的时候(我知道很容易累，很枯燥)，专门拿出一点时间去写一些句子，效果更好。

如果说模版的话，这样就足够了。模版这个东西，背太多没好处，太容易局限思维，还有雷同的风险。

第五，培养找到错误的能力

还要说明一点，以上是针对整个AW而言。对于argument，特别需要注意的是培养找到错误的能力。

具体方法是，阅读一定量的题目。这样的好处有二：

一、通过阅读题目，只找错误来训练。

二、没有谁能保证argument里面不会出现一个你不认识的单词，万一是个关键词，那可就……

argument其实和issue也是想通的，锻炼一者的同时另一者一定也会提高，所以不要纠结浪费时间的问题。

第六，关于机经

我的意见是，反正写什么都是写，不如按照机经写。当然，如果能写很多很多，那我的意见没有什么参考价值。

GRE写作范文：选修课和必修课

题目：

Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study because acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated.

大学应该要求每一个学生在自己专业课外选修各种学科，因为获得各种学科的知识才是获得真正教育的最好途径。

正文：

I strongly disagree what the issue brought out that each student in university should take various courses outside the student's field of study in order to acquire a wide scope of knowledge and be truly educated. One of the reasons is based on common sense that it is impossible to take such a measurement since the students have their own specific backgrounds, of educational or cultural. Furthermore, the speaker has misunderstood the means of true education. In the following discussion, I would illustrate my point of view more particularly.

In the first place, the fact that every student has distinctive personality of his or her own should not be ignored. So several questions emerge. Is it suitable for some students who have deep enthusiasm on their field of study to take various courses?Are they willing to take such courses? What is the scope of the various courses? Are these courses ranged from abstruse disciplines, such as the classic physiology to easy courses, such as extremely popular cultural appreciating courses? Consider it more practically, is it necessary for some students who have already had heavy burden on them to take such "a variety of "courses? Unless these questions can be solved, the recommendation the speaker maintains is obviously not a good method of receiving education, let alone the true education.

In addition, having referred to taking so many courses outside the major field, the concept of education should be weighed carefully. The question of what true education should do has been argued for thousands of years since the most primitive form of education appeared in the ancient time. Socrates, a philosopher living approximately thousands of years ago, whose theory of education has a far fetching effect to the human being, claimed clearly that look into your own selves and find the spark of truth that God has put into every heart, and that only you can kindle to a flame.

Although it reflected more theological ideology than the education perspective, the connotation of his remark reveals that true education is not inserting the stuffing of information into a person, but rather eliciting knowledge from him. As long as we understand it, it is explicit that taking a variety of courses without considering the specific situation of students and the knowledge structure has nothing to do with the true education, and the function of this method is only to stuff as much knowledge as possible to the students. On contrary, what should do is that take the necessary courses, which will do good to the major field the students pursue according to their specific courses. The quality is the key, but not the quantity.

Admittedly, taking several courses, which have some correlation with their major field,will take a positive effect on the students. Two advantages are not difficult to be found.Firstly, the relevant subject will assure the student a broader ken. It is unimaginable that some experts have only single penchant in their narrow area. What is more,through learning other disciplines, new angles can be used in the old views. Secondly,increasingly appearance of verge subjects requires us to take more interactive disciplines. The example of the subject of bio-information is a good illustration here.Thus, I do agree taking relevant subjects is necessary.

To sum up, whether taking various discipline or not is according to the specific situations and this measurement should not contradict the true education. Given the evidences referred above, which sometimes interweave into an integrated whole and become more cogent, we may safely arrive at the conclusion what I support.

GRE写作怎么模仿范文

.要有可以模仿的文章(最好是带有说理性的文章)。

2.你要理解这个文章，理解它的用词、句子结构、段落结构。

3.这些文章都有正确的中文翻译。同时，文章的长度不能超过500字。

怎么模仿，首先要分析文章，分析每一句和上一句是什么关系。我给大家举个例子：美国人写作文的一个特点是，通常每段的第一句都包含了整段文字的内容，也就是我们常说的topic sentence.。另一个特点是当你写完一个句子后，你要问WHY。你提出一个问题，然后给出一个圆满的回答，这就是一篇优秀的作文。

再下一步就要具体了。写作需要三大能力：

一、具体化的能力

具体化并不代表要写一个完整的故事。但是任何一篇文章都要给人一个具体的意向。通过具体的东西来描述才能给人踏实的感觉。具体化只要举出几个地方、几个名字、几件小事就可以了。

为什么好多同学作文中分数很低呢，就是因为他提出了问题却没有回答。

你通过不断地模仿写作，就可以不断地纠正语法和词组错误。如何把抽象和具体结合起来是一个重点，如何在一个段落中只表达一个思想，这是另一个重点。美国人的判分特点是，如果你在一段中表达了一个以上的思想，那你的分数就不会高了。

分析完一篇文章后，怎么模仿着写呢?就是看着中文的翻译，把上面的英文一字不落的写下来，当你实在想不起来的时候，再看原文。等到写完之后，和原文对照一下，看看是谁写得漂亮。我刚刚开始模仿写作的时候发现，模仿了几天后，写作水平的确提高了。

因为根据记忆学原则，这个单词你背过、读过，它都不能写在你的文章中间。如果一个单词可以经常出现在你的脑子和文章中间，那这只证明了一件事，就是你写过这个字。但是你自己写作你不可能用到这个字，那就只有一个可能，就是你在模仿文章时写过这个字。如果一个结构别人写不出来，你能写出来，那你的分数就会高。

通过不断地模仿你的几大能力就会得到提高：

1.你的语法错误会越来越少;

2.句子结构能力越来越强;

3.用词能力大大增加。

一篇文章模仿两次就足够了。当你模仿了10篇文章之后，你把这10篇文章再模仿一遍。等你模仿完20篇文章，你的写作能力就会大大提高了。

二、逻辑思维能力

在美国许多的写作考试中TOEFL写作是相对容易的。因为它的作文题本身非常简单，看到一个作文题你几乎就知道该怎么写。而GRE作文就相对复杂了。 GRE作文方式永远是两种态度，两种方式让你选择。它永远是有对照性的。

托福作文考：“吃饭是在家里吃好，还是到饭店里吃好”; GMAT考和商业有关的：“产品制造出来是延续时间很长的好，还是延续时间不太长的好”;GRE作文：“在我们这个社会中间，现在专业人士太多了，而有综合知识的人太少了。你认为我们是更需要具有专业知识的人呢，还是需要具有广博知识的人?”

TOEFL考生活、学习;GRE 考日常学术行为。但是不管它出什么题目，总是会摆出两种态度供你选择。另外，GRE的作文题目是提前发给你的，考试时出的题目绝不会超出它事先发给你的题目。它决不会出让学生看不懂的题目。所出的题目永远是世界性的，不涉及民族、宗教、政治色彩。

考察普林斯顿所出的全部范文后发现，美国人百分之七八十喜欢倾向于一种模式。讨论在哪里吃的问题时，要不在家里吃，要不在饭店吃，但是你不要又想在家里，又想在饭店(A　OR　B)。当然他们也比较认可中间的态度(C)，也就是说，我既要A又要B，我是A和B结合起来产生C。事实上，好多中国学生结合 A、B写是能写出好分数的。当然也有些题目是没有C这种态度的。

C态度这种写法和A、B的写法，在段落结构上是有差异的。我先讲两种文章的段落结构。

如果是采取A或B的写法，段落结构是比较简单的。通常分为三个层次，第一个层次是第一段。说明我要采取A还是B。第二个层次可以不只一段，说明为什么选择A/B是对的。为什么要有三段呢。因为必须至少有2个理由，至多3个理由。美国人认为一个理由是不够的，4个理由绝对太多。他们最喜欢 2到3个理由。最后一段就是结尾，讨论B的缺点和部分优点，同时坚决强调你要选择A。

GRE写作开头结尾都是得分重点相关文章：

★ GRE作文高分结尾段花式写法整理分享

★ 教师个人述职报告开头结尾范文6篇

★ 领导干部述职报告开头结尾范文5篇